The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) is dissatisfied with the Supreme Court’s ruling overturning the Court of Appeal's decision to quash the Finance Act 2023.
However, in a statement, LSK President Faith Odhiambo agreed with the court’s recommendation that a statute be enacted to guide public participation.
Odhiambo noted that in upholding the impugned provisions of the Finance Act 2023 as constitutional, the Court went to great lengths to demonstrate why, in its view, the issues surrounding public participation in the Act were not compelling.
“We respectfully disagree with the approach taken by the court. The expeditiousness of the legislative process cannot override legitimate expectation and public interest, nor can Parliament be exempt from the need to justify its decisions under the guise of legislative processes not constituting administrative actions,” Odhiambo said.
Odhiambo was reacting to the Supreme Court’s ruling on Tuesday, which overturned the Court of Appeal’s decision declaring the Finance Act 2023 unconstitutional.
Did you read this?
The Supreme Court’s decision came after a consolidated appeal concerning the legislative process that led to enacting the Finance Bill, 2023, into the Finance Act 2023, following Presidential assent on June 26, 2023.
On July 31, 2024, the Court of Appeal declared the Act entirely unconstitutional, null, and void, citing inadequate public participation.
However, the seven-judge Supreme Court bench, led by Chief Justice Martha Koome, dismissed the appeal, stating that no law currently governs public participation.
“The Bill was subjected to adequate and satisfactory public participation, taking into account the circumstances surrounding the enactment of a Finance Act. Therefore, we find no basis to declare the entire Act unconstitutional,” the Supreme Court declared.
The Supreme Court further advised that Parliament should establish a legislative framework to regulate public participation as envisioned under the Constitution.
