Miguna Miguna asserts that no individual, including a judge, possesses the authority to order the death of another individual following Jowie Irungu's sentencing. He argues that the imposition of the death penalty, in this case, contravenes constitutional principles.
The vocal lawyer also argued that no human being including a judge has the power to order the killing of anyone.
“I oppose the death penalty. A human being, including a judge, shouldn’t have the power to order the killing of anyone. It also violates the Constitution, which banned the death penalty,” Miguna stated.
Justice Grace Nzioka has issued a death sentence against Jowie, citing alignment with the offense of murder as outlined in section 204 of Kenya's Penal Code.
Did you read this?
I don’t like Joseph Kuria Irungu alias Jowie. I believe that he is a cold-blooded murderer; a barbarian who should be severely punished for his crimes. However, I OPPOSE the death penalty. A human being, including a judge, shouldn’t have the power to order the killing of anyone.…
— Dr. Miguna Miguna (@MigunaMiguna) March 13, 2024
Prior to the ruling, Jowie pleaded for leniency and requested Justice Nzioka to consider a custodial sentence, highlighting that he was a first-time offender.
The High Court Judge emphasized that the murder of the late businesswoman was premeditated and executed with intent.
“The manner in which the offense was committed did not at any one point intend to give the deceased even a single minute to live. It is a tragic loss of life on extreme circumstances bordering on madness,” Justice Nzioka argued.
According to the probation officer's report, Jowie displays characteristics of instability in partner relationships, demonstrates an antisocial personality, and exhibits impartiality. Additionally, he is described as a thrill seeker who utilizes anger to assert control over others.
