The Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) has dismissed allegations that some of its members were coerced into adopting consensus during the ongoing grassroots elections.
In a statement issued on Thursday, ODM labeled the claims as false and aimed at creating unnecessary tension within the party. The party emphasized that its election guidelines, as outlined in its official handbook, are being strictly adhered to.
"Methods of election are clearly defined in this Handbook... Media reports that members were forced to go the consensus way are false, misleading, and aimed at causing disharmony in the party," ODM said in a statement posted on X (formerly Twitter).
The party's handbook provides for two main methods of conducting elections: consensus-building and voting by members or delegates.
Did you read this?
*Consensus-Building*
This method involves harmonizing current offices and filling vacant positions, provided members in the respective county agree to it and that all individuals being retained meet the eligibility criteria.
*Voting*
If members or delegates fail to reach consensus, elections can proceed through various voting methods, including raising hands, queuing behind candidates ("mlolongo"), or secret ballot.
The clarification comes amidst reports of disruptions in some grassroots elections, including a violent incident in Gem Constituency.
Two individuals are currently hospitalized at Yala Subcounty Hospital after being attacked by irate villagers during the ODM grassroots elections at Muhanda Primary School in Gem Yala Subcounty.
The confrontation began when suspicious strangers were seen loitering in vehicles near the polling venue along the Kisumu-Busia highway. When challenged to identify themselves, they allegedly declined, prompting the attack. Good Samaritans later intervened and transported the victims to the hospital.
Despite the chaos in some areas, ODM has reiterated its commitment to conducting free, fair, and transparent elections while maintaining harmony within its ranks.
